Asking in a professional capacity again.
The port appears briefly and there is more in the background of that sequence than in most of the rest of the footage combined. Containers, a terminal building, at least two vessels, and something on the far quay that I would like a second opinion on.
I am not saying what. You know how this works by now.
The system works.
Interior lighting through glass on a background building is exactly the kind of thing that gets cut when a location is scenery.
The far quay is the part I would want a second opinion on as well, and I notice neither of us is saying what we think is on it.
three separate people now refusing to name things they have seen in a port. this is either rigour or a shared psychiatric event
there is a brand on one of the containers that i cannot read and it is number thirty two on my list as a maybe
I have been through it. There is more environmental detail in that thirty seconds than in most of the residential sections, which is consistent with a location built for something rather than for driving past.
Cruise ship capital of the world was in the official description and everyone treated it as flavour. It reads differently now.
the terminal building has interior lighting visible through the glass which is not something you do for background geometry